Structured Hiring Process: Why Informal Interviews Are Your Biggest Legal Risk
- Maria Mor, CFE, MBA, PMP
- Feb 17
- 5 min read
Your hiring manager just asked a candidate, "So, do you have kids?" It felt like small talk. It was actually a liability.
According to a Huntr 2025 Annual Job Search Trends Report, roughly one-third of job seekers reported being asked illegal or generally prohibited questions during interviews in 2025. Questions about age, marital status, family plans, health conditions. Not in some back-alley operation. In real businesses with real revenue and real reputations on the line.
The pattern behind this risk? It is almost never malicious. It is almost always structural.
The Real Problem Is Not Bad People
Here is what 25 years across different industries has taught me about hiring: the companies asking illegal interview questions are rarely doing it on purpose.
They are doing it because nobody documented what interviewers should ask. Nobody trained the manager who just got promoted last quarter. Nobody built a repeatable system for evaluating candidates the same way every time.
Employment attorney Eric Kingsley put it well in a recent Business Journals analysis: the prevalence of these questions reveals outdated hiring practices, not bad ones. Interviewers are acting on habit, curiosity, or outdated advice. Some incorrectly believe that as long as they do not act on the answers, there is no problem.
From a legal perspective, there is no such exemption.
A separate ResumeBuilder.com survey of 1,000 hiring managers found that 32% admitted they knowingly ask illegal questions. Not because they wanted to discriminate. Because the process never told them not to.
What "Informal" Actually Costs
The word "informal" sounds harmless. In a hiring context, it is expensive.
When interviews run on instinct instead of structure, bias creeps in. Questions drift into territory that creates legal exposure. Candidates get evaluated on likability rather than capability. And the business ends up hiring based on gut feeling, then wondering why turnover stays high.
A Criteria survey of 2,516 job candidates found that 64% identified inappropriate or personal questions as the single biggest mistake an employer can make during an interview. That means nearly two-thirds of the people you are trying to attract already associate unstructured interviews with red flags.
The Greenhouse 2025 Workforce and Hiring Report reinforced this pattern: over half of U.S. job seekers reported facing illegal or discriminatory questions during their job search. Among baby boomers, that number climbed to 61%.
These are not edge cases. This is a systemic gap that shows up whenever a business treats hiring like a conversation instead of a process.
Where Small Businesses Get Exposed
Large companies have HR departments. They have compliance teams, legal counsel on retainer, and standardized interview guides that get updated annually.
Small businesses usually have a hiring manager who is also the operations lead, the customer service backup, and the person who fixes the printer. Hiring gets squeezed between everything else. The interview becomes whatever feels right in the moment.
Stephanie Heathman, CEO of The HR Innovator Group, identified the core issue in the same Business Journals report: the risk increases dramatically when companies decentralize hiring without guardrails. What shows up most often is not malicious intent but unstructured interviews, untrained managers, and outdated assumptions about what qualifies as "just conversation."
This is where small businesses are most vulnerable. Not because the people are careless. Because the process does not exist.
Meanwhile, hiring itself is getting harder. The Huntr report tracked the median time from first application to first offer letter stretching from 57 days at the start of 2025 to 83 days by the end of the year. The Hays 2026 U.S. Salary and Hiring Trends Guide found that 70% of organizations now use AI in their hiring workflows. Employers are being more selective, with 42% prioritizing upskilling existing workers over bringing on new hires.
In that environment, every interview matters more. And every unstructured interview carries more risk.
Not sure where your business processes are leaking time and money?
Get the free 5 Steps to Streamline guide and start identifying where systems need structure.
A Structured Hiring Process Protects Everyone
The fix is not complicated. It is just not happening.
A structured hiring process means every candidate gets the same core questions. Those questions tie directly to job requirements. Interviewers know what they can ask and, more importantly, what they cannot. Scoring is consistent. Documentation exists.
This is not about creating bureaucracy. It is about building a repeatable system that protects the business from legal exposure, reduces bad hires, and gives every candidate a fair evaluation.
The pattern across every expert quoted in recent hiring research points to the same recommendations: use structured interview guides tied to job-related criteria, train all interviewers on compliance, centralize question design, and treat hiring like the compliance-controlled process it actually is.
Here is what I have noticed working across Fortune 500 operations and small teams alike: the companies that build structure into hiring early rarely face these problems. The companies that wait until something goes wrong spend far more cleaning up the damage.
Why Outside Perspective Helps
When you are running interviews, managing operations, and trying to grow revenue at the same time, the gaps in your hiring process become invisible. You do not see the risk because you are too close to it.
This is a proximity issue, not a competence issue.
An outside perspective can identify where your interview process lacks documentation, where managers need training, and where informal habits have quietly become legal liabilities. It is the same pattern across every broken process: the people inside the system cannot see what the system is missing.
Ready to find where your business processes need structure?
Get the 5 Steps to Streamline guide and identify:
Where undocumented processes create risk
Which workflows need standardization first
How to prioritize fixes that protect your business
Get the Guide - See where your business stands
Or book a discovery call and get a clear-eyed look at where your operations are exposed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a structured hiring process only necessary for large companies?
No. Small businesses actually face higher relative risk because they typically lack dedicated HR or legal teams to catch compliance issues. A structured approach does not require a big budget. It requires documented questions, basic interviewer training, and a consistent evaluation method. These are process fixes, not resource-intensive overhauls.
What makes an interview question illegal?
Most questions are not illegal to ask on their own. The legal exposure comes when answers reveal information about protected categories, such as age, religion, disability, marital status, or pregnancy, and that information could be perceived as influencing a hiring decision. Even without discriminatory intent, possessing that information creates liability if the candidate is not hired.
How do we transition from informal interviews to a structured hiring process?
Start with the role, not the conversation. Define what the job actually requires, then build questions that assess those specific requirements. Document the questions, train anyone who conducts interviews, and score candidates consistently. The goal is not rigidity. It is repeatability and fairness.
Can we still have natural conversation during interviews?
Absolutely. Structure does not mean robotic. It means every candidate gets the same core questions tied to job performance. Follow-up questions based on individual experience and qualifications are encouraged. The structure simply prevents the conversation from drifting into territory that creates legal exposure.
How often should we review our interview process?
At minimum, annually. Employment laws change frequently, especially at the state level. New regulations around AI in hiring, pay transparency, and salary history are rolling out across multiple states in 2026. A yearly review of your interview questions, scoring criteria, and interviewer training keeps your process current and compliant.
Sources Referenced:
Comments